Tuesday, July 8, 2008

The Road I Didn't Expect to Take



A few of my well-worn Bibles


Before I get into the meat of today's post, I'd like to share a story. Several years ago, one of my sisters-in-law was struggling with faith. During a visit to us, she announced to me, "You're not a Christian."

Instantly, I became defensive. "What do you mean?" I demanded. "You have no right to say that. I don't allow anybody to decide whether I'm a Christian. Only God can decide that."

Her answer surprised me and instantly defused my anger. "Ruth, every Christian I know is so judgmental. You aren't."

What a sad commentary on the times in which we live. Let me state for the record that despite my SIL's words, I do struggle to overcome judgmentalism. And I believe my SIL was exaggerating the state of "all Christians" out of her own woundedness. Yet I have seen the judgment flung about by those who proclaim themselves Christians--of every denomination--and I have sometimes been hurt by that rush to judgment.

For instance, I know that some people think that it's not possible to be a sincere Christian and hold the beliefs I'm about to describe. On the opposite end, some people question the depth of those who hold more traditional beliefs. I would like to think there is room for all of us in Christendom. And so I'm going to describe a journey I've been on for the last 30 years.

It was a journey I never expected to take, but one which at this point is irreversible. It was the path that led me from fundamentalism to a more liberal view of the Bible.

For a long time, I had a fundamentalist / Evangelical view of Scripture. I was raised in a Baptist church and then went to Wheaton College, where I took the required Bible and religion classes. I was in a Navigators' Bible study for most of college. (If you aren't familiar with Navs, you can click here.) I didn't change my belief in a literal, inerrant Bible from lack of training. I was well grounded in that doctrine, and at one time, I had memorized many Bible verses supporting it.

However, as time passed, I found that I couldn't continue to read the Bible in the same way. There were too many questions, too many things that made a literal reading impossible for me. I now believe the Bible is inspired by God but shaped by the human beings who wrote it, and therefore it contains some flaws that we have to work through to get at what God wanted to say. I will briefly recount the steps of my journey, more or less in order—not to try to persuade anyone to abandon their views., but just to explain my own.

1. Some things seem to show that the Bible contains passages that belong to an entirely different belief system or to an older mythology. I offer two examples:
When people began to multiply on the face of the ground, and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that they were fair; and they took wives for themselves of all that they chose. Gen. 6:1-2

In the six-hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on that day all the fountains of the great deep burst forth, and the windows of the heavens were opened. Gen. 7:11
I have heard many complicated explanations of each passage, but I don't find them as convincing as the obvious explanation that this shows that the Bible contains remnants of more ancient documents

2. At Wheaton, I took a class in the Bible as literature, which taught that the Bible is a collection of many literary genres: letters, poems, historical chronicles, etc. To fully understand what passages are telling us, it is important to read them with their genre in mind. If someone sent you a poem, you would read that differently than you would read a prose letter from the same person. For example, I once heard a sermon on Isaiah 65, and the pastor said with all seriousness that verse 20—No more shall there be in it an infant that lives but a few days, or an old person who does not live out a lifetime; for one who dies at a hundred years will be considered a youth,and one who falls short of a hundred will be considered accursed—meant that in the new heaven and new earth, anyone who didn't accept God by the age of 100 would drop dead. He'd read the verse literally instead of figuratively, and robbed it of both its sense and its beauty.

3. Although I clung for a long time to a belief in a 7-day creation, I have finally let that go. I believe now that the creation story teaches us truths about God and humans, although not the exact facts of our origins. I have no idea how evolution and creation mesh into the truth of what really happened, but that lack of knowledge doesn't disturb me. I can accept mystery when it comes to God.

4. Some passages make sense to me only if they are put in a cultural perspective—by examining who wrote it, what the issues of the time were, and who the intended audience was. One example is the following passage from I Timothy 2: "I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over a man; she is to keep silent. For Adam was formed first, then Eve; and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor." When I read that passage literally, it tells me that sin has so damaged women that they can never be redeemed enough to take full part in the life of the church. That puts limits on the saving power of God, which I cannot accept. But when I remember that the early church developed out of one patriarchal culture (Judaism) and was fighting to survive in an even more patriarchal culture (Rome), the distrust of women makes sense. It also seems to be something that belongs in the past.

5. There is precedent in the Bible itself for deciding that some passages are not fully in keeping with God's will. In Matthew 19:8, Jesus said, "Because of your hardness of heart Moses permitted you to divorce your wives; but from the beginning it has not been this way." In essence, he was saying, "Well, this part of the Bible is wrong. It's not truly God's will. It was the best we could do because your hearts are so hard."

Although my approach to the Bible has changed, I still view it as the foundation of  my faith. To quote the Book of Common Prayer, I believe "Holy Scripture containeth all things necessary for salvation."

For the last four years, I've been attending my pastor's Bible study and learning how to study the Bible seriously even when I don't accept its every word. They have probably been the most challenging studies I ever participated in over the course of my 35 years of doing Bible study. We look for the broad patterns of the Bible. We examine the historical, cultural, and literary context and see what it adds. And if things contradict each other (which they sometimes do), we make the best sense of the contradiction that we can. Most of all, we ask questions and learn to live with the tension of not having it all perfectly clear.

Even though I use a different approach to the Bible, I take it as seriously as I ever did.

32 comments:

bonnie said...

My nephews are named Evan and Ian. I hope the boys in your church are well soon.

Wormwood's Doxy said...

Thanks for sharing this, Ruth. My journey was, in some ways, very similar to yours.

(It's amazing to me how often Wheaton College comes up in conversation with former fundagelicals who are now members of TEC!)

Have you considered signing up for Education for Ministry? I think it would be right up your alley. (Full disclosure: I'm an EFM mentor.)

Bob Brague said...

Ruth, thank you for your ongoing honesty and transparency. I think the Road You Never Expected To Take, also known as the Road Less Traveled, is more noble (see "Bereans") than the Road Most People Take Without Ever Giving It A Thought Because If Everyone Else Is Doing It It Must Be Right. To accept unthinkingly what you were told is to be pre-programmed like a robot, to swallow someone else's faith whole without ever tasting or chewing for yourself, and other fates too horrible to contemplate. I will now put an end to my pontificating, but I know one thing for sure: I will never win an award for writing short sentences.

My old friend and pastor Torrey Johnson from Chicago, who died at the age of 93, used to say the Bible is not a history book, but where it touches on history it is accurate, and the Bible is not a science book, but where it touches on science it is accurate. Maybe the sons of God did take wives for themselves of the daughters of men, and maybe the fountains of the great deep did burst forth in the six-hundredth year of Noah's life. Who alive today can say whether they did or didn't? And who can say what those statements really mean?

Keep on keeping on. Remember that the journey is not the destination.

Joan said...

Our journey connects in many ways, Ruth. Don't ever stop writing...you are an encouragement to all of us.
God's ways are mysterious and wonderful and blessing us in ways we could never imagine.
xoxoxoxo

Jay said...

What a very refreshing and eloquent post!

I too have found that I cannot take the Bible literally. The Old Testament, particularly, is full of myth and history and allegory, written as it was in the tradition of the cultures and people of the time. It's a collection of various books and forms and when I read it (not as often as I should, probably) the thing that comes to mind most forcibly is that God gave me a brain, with a mind of my own and the intelligence to think. We are told that we are made in HIs image, so therefore it seems logical to me that he intends us to use our intelligence and the questioning, analytical skills he gave us, in addition to our natural capacity for faith and trust.

And you know that there are many roads up that mountain. ;)

Sharon said...

Good morning Ruth. I read my Bible and I believe what is in the Bible. There are some strange verses in there, but they do not sway me. I have a faith in God period. I think it is good to question though and to study it until we do understand. I want to live the best I can for the Lord and to try to live by the standards that Christ set for us even though I fail every day, His mercies are new every morning!

Have a great day!

:0) Sharon

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

Bon, thank you for thinking of the boys. They need all the good thoughts they can get.

Doxy, I had not heard of EFM. I'll check into it.

Bob, thank you for your supportive remarks. They brought tears to my eyes. I love that you closed with, "Keep on keeping on."

Joan, you know how much I love you.

Jay, I agree. In the Episcopal Church, we often say that God did not ask us to check our minds at the door.

Sharon, I love the way you said, "There are some strange verses in there, but they do not sway me." That is such a sensible approach. Hugs.

Diane Vogel Ferri said...

All I can add is AMEN! I too started out much more fundamental and somehow in the process of living have changed many of my veiwpoints - but NONE of my faith. I particularly object to one verse in the old Testament condemning gays when so much of the rest of the OT cannot be taken literally any longer. Thank you for your honesty. I do agree.

Diane Vogel Ferri said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
odd chick said...

I am so glad you came to my blog because I had a chance to meet YOU!! I was just trying to explain this approach to the Bible to my MOM. I believe God and His Words- I believe He could do anything- but I believe He wanted a relationship with man and He used that in spreading His Word but we have everything we need. Anyway, you said it with much more sense and logic and helped explain what I had been wrestling with in my own mind. That's what good writing does. thank you.

Pat - An Arkansas Stamper said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Pat - An Arkansas Stamper said...

Thanks for sharing your journey, Ruth. May God continue to bless you as you keep on keeping on.

My theologian/minister daddy gave me a head start on my transition from the Southern Baptist denomination to the Episcopal Church, but it still took me a long time to make the break (I was 54 years old when I was confirmed in the ECUSA.) I do not regret the years spent as a Baptist, but am very happy to be able to participate more fully in the ministry of the church (as a female -- the opportunity for which was denied in my former denomination.)

Do check into EFM.

Pat - An Arkansas Stamper said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Dawn said...

Ruth- this is an excellent post full of thought provoking ideas. I seem to be on a similar journey, maybe not as far along as you, but wanting to learn more. I appreciate you sharing your heart here.

Jan said...

Ruth, you are so eloquent about your faith and your journey. You wrote really well about the transition in your views of the Bible, and then you ended it so well with your last sentence. I agree with you very much.

Kelly Jene said...

I'm glad you are continuing to study and I pray God clarifies all of your questions.

For me, personally, I believe that the Bible is the inspired and infallible Word of God, fully authoritative for all matters of faith and practice.

FranIAm said...

I am late to this so will be brief...

This reminds me of what my pastor says all the time, "everything in the Bible is true. Some of it may have even happened!"

I love the way your current learning (which is similar to what we have been doing in a new scripture study program at my church) is about breadth, depth and context.

Amen!
(and that was brief?! hah!)

odd chick said...

You leaving me that information about Ira Glass's video to watched really, really, helped me! Thanks you for taking the time to encourage me!

Presbyterian Gal said...

Someone once said in a Bible study group that studying the Bible is like peeling the layers of an onion. (Though,personally, I find the Bible smells much nicer than an onion).

I think that each year or years I live give me deeper perspective and motivate me further to look at history, context and translation accuracy when I study the Bible. It's also made me less conservative. And I believe the Bible to be the inspired word of God written through the lens of humanity.

I will say, though, that regarding Genesis, Gerald Schroeder's book, "The Science of God" presents some compelling scientific comparisons in terms of comparative timelines. Time back at the Big Bang was not the same as Time today.

Thanks for sharing this.

"JEANNELLE" said...

I'm in a denomination which believes the Bible IS the actual Word of God.......not contains the Word of God.....IS the Word of God. They won't allow any analysis as mentioned in your #1. The Lutheran Confessions contain the rules for interpreting the Bible.....we must never deviate from that, or we are committing exegesis, which is frowned upon.

MikeF said...

Thank you, Ruth. Beautiful and true - you had me glued to the monitor from the first few lines!

Blessings

Mike

Wormwood's Doxy said...

I'm in a denomination which believes the Bible IS the actual Word of God

It really helped me when thoughtful Christians pointed out to me that JESUS is the Word of God---the Logos, God made flesh, God's revelation of God's self to the world.

To treat the Bible as THE Word of God is to commit idolatry--to worship the book, rather than the living God.

Jesus is The Word of God, not the Bible. Of course, we know Jesus and God through the Bible---but, in my view, it is a terrible spiritual mistake to confuse them.

And if one believes that the Holy Spirit moves and acts in the world, I'm not sure how it is possible to hold that the Bible is God's complete revelation to humanity...

The Lutheran Confessions contain the rules for interpreting the Bible.....we must never deviate from that, or we are committing exegesis, which is frowned upon.

Anytime a preacher stands up in the pulpit and "explains" scripture, s/he is "committing exegesis." I hope the church you go to just meets to read scripture out loud, has coffee, and then goes home. ;-)

Pax,
Doxy

Ginni Dee said...

This is a very interesting post. It's fascinating following your journey as a Christian, Ruth.

I was particularly drawn by Jeanelle's comment, being a Lutheran and not remembering things being quite that strictly fundamental in the Lutheran church where I was raised. Our wonderful pastors did a great job of interpretation, I thought! So I did a little research and found this website about the Lutheran Confessions...please scroll down and read #3.

http://www.bookofconcord.org/resources/confessionsandbible.html

In case you can't access that site, it says, "3. Other good Christian writings, that is, "good, useful, and pure books, such as interpretations of the Holy Scriptures, refutations of errors, and expositions of doctrinal articles" have their place too. They are not to be rejected or spurned. "If they are in accord with the aforementioned pattern of doctrine [namely, the Confessions], they are to be accepted and used as helpful expositions and explanations" "

I always find things that make me think when I read your blog Ruth! I love that!! You've always had that talent and we are all the richer for knowing you!!!

XOXOXOX

Rosezilla said...

I am glad you are continuing to study and pray, and that you have faith in God. Too many people run the other way when they encounter the hard truths in the Bible. The other temptation is to say God doesn't really mean what He says in His Word, or that He never really even said it at all. Deepening your faith and understanding can be hard. But that's where the trust comes in, the faith. If you develop a relationship with God through Jesus Christ, then you will learn to trust Him. There are many things you can just trust Him to hold on to for you until you are ready for them. There is a reason why God calls it "the meat of the word," because you have to be able to digest it. It seems too many people are choking on the meat, when they should still be drinking the nourishing milk. Once your trust has grown, you'll be able, like Peter, to keep your eyes on Jesus and step out in faith on the truth of His word. It wasn't until he took his eyes off Jesus that he fell. One thing that has helped me is to realize that God's Word is the measuring stick, not the thing to be measured. Hold everything else up to its light, then "Trust in the Lord with all your heart, and lean not unto your own understanding." Sometimes you have to obey without understanding everything, the same way we expect children to obey us until they grow old enough to make decisions for themselves. I've found there are many things I don't understand until after I have obeyed - but I have also learned that I can always trust Him.

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

Rosezilla, you said, If you develop a relationship with God through Jesus Christ. What on God's green earth makes you think that I haven't?

You seem to have decided that because I have a different view of the Bible than you do, that I neither trust nor obey God. You also seem to have decided that my faith is immature. Respectfully, I must say to you that you do not know me well enough to make that judgment--unless you are willing to also dismiss the faith of the millions and millions of Christians whose beliefs lie outside Evangelical norms.

Rosezilla said...

Yikes, Ruth, did it really come across like that???? I am so sorry. I really don't have the hang of this whole cyber chat thing, because things don't come across the way i mean them at all. I was making no judgements about you at all - I was only trying to be comforting, and to say what worked for me. I in no way think I have all the answers - I only believe that God does! I should have followed Jennifer's excellent lead and stuck to Scripture. I promise you I am not a judgemental person and have decided to pass things by someone before commenting on anything serious again!

Rosezilla said...

Ok, I read it back over and I can see how it sounded. I tend to think out loud in general on here and forget I am talking directly to a person. And as for the first question, I KNOW you have developed a relationship with Him because that's what you began all this with - how happy you were that it wasn't just head knowledge, it was a relationship - and I was just continuing the thought. I am sincerely sorry for how it came across.

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

Thank you for coming back and explaining. That was very quick, and it means a lot to me. I think what caused the confusion was the word you. You must have meant it in a universal way, and I took it as meaning "me."

No hard feelings. I understand what you were trying to say now.

Rosezilla said...

Thank you, that is a tremendous relief to me. I love debating Scripture - I think it helps to sharpen all our understanding when we can learn from each other - but I find it much easier in person. I have a great deal of respect for people who are willing to debate civilly, and that means debating the issue and not the person! So I was horrified that it sounded that way when I read it back! I am truly grateful we have resolved it so quickly.

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

Me too! And I also like civil debates that don't get personal.

Talking in person is always easier. Something like 70% of communication is nonverbal, which is why Internet discussion can be so hard even with the best intentions in the world.

Tobias Haller said...

Thank you, Ruth, for this testimony. God bless you in your faithful journey...