Friday, September 26, 2008

My Take on Politics Meme


Border Explorer tagged me with this meme almost a week ago. (It was originally written by Katie Schwartz, so the wording of the questions is hers.) The meme has been making the rounds and now it's my turn.


1) What is your name (nickname, whatever you're comfortable sharing), your age (range), gender, occupation, income bracket (range), how you identify (gay/straight/whatever)? Married/Single/Divorced? Kids (how many)?

Name: Ruth Hull Chatlien
Age: 50; Female; freelance writer;
income ranges wildly because my husband and I are both independent contractors;
straight/married; childless to our sorrow

2) What are the most important issues to you in this presidential election and why?

—bringing the war in Iraq to an end; making sure that we don't establish a permanent occupation of that country (which I believe would be motivated by desire for oil)
—avoiding a rush to war with Iran
—repairing international relations
—providing national health care (We're relatively lucky. So far, we can afford to pay $8,000 to fund our own health insurance--which covers anything over our individual $2,500 deductibles. Not a lot of Americans can afford to shell out $13,000 before getting any help with medical bills.)
—reducing the national debt (which sadly isn't going to happen now with the current bailout)
—securing Social Security

3) Why do you think voters should vote for Obama/Biden, what differentiates this ticket from McCain/Palin?

I would not vote for McCain because I do not want privatized Social Security. I do not want further deregulation of corporations. I do not want to be dragged into the Russia / Georgia conflict. I do not want war with Iran or North Korea. I do not want further erosion of my civil rights such as took place under the so-called Patriot Act.

I vote Democrat because I do want health insurance for all. I do want gun control. I do want clear separation of church and state. I do want a government that is willing to negotiate with other nations instead of seeing himself as the head policeman of the world.

4) If McCain/Palin wins this election, where do you see our country going in the next four years?

I think John McCain still has a Cold War mentality and we will go back to brinksmanship. I think McCain is a "hot reactor" and we'll get embroiled in situations we should stay out of. I think we will have further spying on American and other erosions of our rights such as the arrests of journalists and bloggers in the Twin Cities during the Republican convention. I think the rich will continue to feast off the poor and the middle class. We will come to resemble Latin American oligarchies. 

5) Economically, where do you think this country is today and how do you think Obama/Biden can make a positive impact?

We are as bad off economically as I have ever seen this country. Greed, mindless spending, an economy that is predicated on consume, consume, consume. We need a president who will remind us, like FDR, that the only thing we really have to fear is fear itself because panic will cause us to do exactly those things that will send the economy into a downward spiral. We need someone who, like JFK, will urge us to ask what we can do for our country. We need someone who has a vision to see beyond the consumer / capitalist model of the economy. We need someone to call for discipline and sacrifice. And we need a president who will enact budgetary responsibility such as we had during the Clinton years.

I think this economy needs to become more socialist, not less. It's obscene to live in a society where some people have $30 million and some try to live on $30,000. When you read how the early church functioned or about the ideal of the year of Jubilee in the Old Testament, they sound a lot more like socialism than capitalism. Jesus judges us by how well we treat the least of these. One look at Wall Street tells you how well the unbridled free market does that.

6) In the past 8-years, how do you think this country has changed under the Bush regime? Have you been affected by these changes? If so, in what ways?

I think we have become further polarized into an us vs. them mentality in so many ways. Not just the United States versus terrorists, but the Unites States versus anyone in the rest of the world who dares to pursue their own self-interest instead of putting the United States first.

The us vs. them mentality has further driven apart Republicans and Democrats, conservative and liberal Christians, rich versus everyone else. This mentality affects and harms all of us because it makes it nearly impossible to have dialogues about issues and find workable solutions. Instead of understanding that democracy needs dissent and compromise and concession, the attitude of the day seems to be "winner take all and to hell with anyone else." That applies both to economics and politics, and it saddens and scares me.

7) I have read that Palin is considered the new voice of feminism, which is offensive in my opinion. Of equal concern are her views on abortion and the removal of books from libraries. I'd like to know what you think about all of that and how you feel about McCain choosing Palin as a running mate. And what kind of message you think that sends to women?

A feminist? By whose definition? Feminists don't charge rape victims for evidence kits. Feminists--contrary to what conservatives say--don't think there is only one model for how to be a woman. Palin's instincts are combative, authoritarian, and reactionary. Given her response to legislative probes in Alaska, she has no respect for rule of law or constitutional checks and balances. If she is elected, she will be a terrible role model of women in a position of influence.

This meme has been circulating for a while, so I'm not going to tag anyone. If you're interested in tackling it, help yourself.

21 comments:

rhymeswithplague said...

I'm sure you will get a lot of support for your thoughts here. I don't think I could ever participate in any kind of political meme. My views are my own, and I choose to reveal them only in the voting booth.

I would be interested in hearing how you reconcile your interpretation of the third temptation in yesterday's post with some of your views expressed in this post, though.

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

Bob, I'm not sure where there is a contradiction.

I do not demand that God protect me from every risk, although I pray for protection. If hardships come, I try to keep my faith.

Yet, I do think that a just society should try to protect its weakest members and prevent abuses of greed and power.

Where is the conflict?

Ginni Dee said...

Interesting post Ruth...I think I'll pass on the meme tho. It's something I have a hard time putting down in writing. (My political views, that is) And I'm not sure I have made any decisions yet anyway.

thailandchani said...

Hi Ruth! :) Love what you had to say.

Something occurred to me as I was reading. The last thing I claim to be is a Christian theologian so I'd like your opinion on this:

When Jesus talks about "the least of these", I'm not convinced yet that he was talking about in the material sense. I think he might have been talking about the spiritually bankrupt. If that's the case, then the real challenge is managing to find compassion for the rich, most of whom are very caught up in using materialism as a measuring stick for all human value.

I just can't wrap my mind around labeling anyone as "least" because they don't own a lot of "stuff".

I consciously chose a third world country as my home because I had never met such spiritually fulfilled people in my life. I'd never seen that kind of day-to-day contentment in the US where everything is measured by achievement, winning at all costs and self-interest.

Wow.. something to ponder anyway. :)

Thanks for the brain food!


~*

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

Chani, here is the quotation:

On the last day, Jesus will say to those on His right hand, "Come, enter the Kingdom. For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was sick and you visited me." Then Jesus will turn to those on His left hand and say, "Depart from me because I was hungry and you did not feed me, I was thirsty and you did not give me to drink, I was sick and you did not visit me." These will ask Him, "When did we see You hungry, or thirsty or sick and did not come to Your help?" And Jesus will answer them, "Whatever you neglected to do unto one of these least of these, you neglected to do unto Me!"

I don't think he meant "least" as in less of a human. I think he was referring to the people who have the smallest rank or status by human reckoning. God judges us by what we do when there is no hope of gain or positive payback. That is a sobering thought, isn't it?

And since we cannot implant the spirit of love and obedience to God in everyone's heart, I believe that secular society must enact laws to provide for everyone to have the minimum of what they need in life. I don't believe in rugged individualisim, sink or swim, or social Darwinism.

thailandchani said...

Thanks for the response. I do understand what you're saying.

And I so completely agree with your last paragraph. That should be emblazoned on a stone in Washington DC somewhere.

:)


~*

Sharon said...

I just came by to say hello and hope you have a happy Friday!

:0) Sharon

Missy said...

And this is the Good News of the Gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ!

Very well articulated, Ruth.

I've got a bit o' bling for you over at my place.

Dawn said...

You are so well informed and have such a gift for putting your views into words. I'm not sure I'm up to the task of doing this meme, but I will certainly give these questions some thought and see what I come up with.

afeatheradrift said...

Oh Ruth, I couldn't find a single statement that you made that I disagree with in any respect. Well done indeed.

Border Explorer said...

Ruth, you are so good. Thank you for undertaking this project. I also agree with it in every aspect. Your writing is gifted. I hope your statement will assist voters in making their decisions. Bless you!

Elizabeth G. said...

Wow, that was some meme. I've never read one that required so much time and effort. Whew!

A thought I've had about the "least" Christ was speaking of...I think that He didn't specifically define it for us, because we all have a different "least". There are to each one of us specific persons that are hard for us to love and yet the Lord commanded us to love everyone. The "least" can certainly be the poor, but they could also be the objects of our personal prejudices. This could could refer to nationalities, political parties or people, education level, attractiveness, the socially awkward, anything that in our minds could detract from a person's worth. We judge so much by externals, whereas the Lord "looketh on the heart." What do you think?

Just a thought.

I'm embarressed to tell you that I gave you an award on my blog and it has a very SHORT meme attached to it. I'm sorry. :( Ha.
Blessings,
Elizabeth

Diane Vogel Ferri said...

Once again and brave and articulate post. I don't feel knowledgeable enough on politics to venture out that way - but I'm glad you did!

rhymeswithplague said...

I've been trying to think how best to reply to your answer to my question. I'm not sure I'm saying this right, but it seems to me you are expecting more from society than from God.

Not trying to pick a fight or start an argument, just a little confused. I think society (made up of fellow fallen creatures, only some of whom are redeemed) is more likely to fail us in a crisis than God.

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

No problem, Bob. I don't think you are picking an argument. I think we just approach this very differently, so I don't mind explaining a bit more.

I do not expect more from society than God. But Gd is my creator and my sovereign. My relation to him is one of petitioning for provision and protection, but not being in a position to demand anything. As a created being. I can express my feelings (and I do) and make requests (which I do), but I don't have the right to tell God what to do. I know that "his ways are not my ways" and I don't always understand why he does what he does. I also know that he has endowed us with free will, and he does not violate that free will even to protect his children. (If someone chooses to harm me, God doesn't reach down and swoop me out of the way.) One of my tasks as a Christian is to work to understand and accept the many things that I as a human don't understand. I do this because of my faith in God's character.

Society, because it is composed of human beings, is by its nature less righteous and just than God. That is precisely why we need government--to curb evil, to pursue the common God, to protect those who cannot protect themselves. In the United States, governmental authority is based on the consent of the governed. It is a derived authority, as opposed to God's intrinsic authority. And as a citizen, I am one of the people who grant government its authority, and I have the right and the obligation to influence the shape that government will take. Government is a social contract, and all citizens have a say in what it should be.

Because I believe human beings are sinful and many pursue selfish ends (as I said, Wall street is the best possible example right now), I choose to pursue a vision in which government evens out income inequalities, rights wrongs, protects the poor and the sick, and provides for the elderly. I don't find this to be a "communist" idea. I find it to be a Biblical idea. The Old Testament ideal was that no one in Israel would be able to lose their land. If they had to sell it because they were in debt, they would sell it only until the next year of Jubilee, when it would revert to them. The idea was to prevent the accumulation of all resources in the hands of a few, while others were impoverished with no hope of relief. (I'm told this never really was followed by Israel, but the law makes it plain that such a system was God's intention for them.) From that ideal, I deduce that capitalism as it exists today is not God's ideal system. So I'm perfectly willing to have high taxes in order to have a system with a safety net.

Of course, there are many opportunities for Christians and churches to pursue charity and to ease some of the social ills I'm talking about . . . but not all. Institutional injustices like out-of-control banking systems or de facto racism or tax structures that favor the wealthy or the unfair clout of health insurance companies cannot be countered by the private sector. Only the power of government can do that.

Oh, and it's not really a question of trusting society more than God. To me, it's a question of viewing myself as part of God's body. I (and all other Christians) are his hands, his feet, his eyes, and his heart in this world. Therefore, I feel the obligation to pursue the issues that I saw Christ pursuing during his time as an incarnate human--feeding the hungry, sheltering the homeless, comforting the sick. I do some of that through financial support and personal efforts, and I do some of that through my political actions.

In other words, whatever I expect from God, I must be willing to try to make happen through my own actions. I believe that every single time I pray, "Thy will be done, thy kingdom come," I am committing myself to trying to bring that kingdom about.

Ruth Hull Chatlien said...

That was supposed to be "pursue the common good," not pursue the common God.

rhymeswithplague said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
rhymeswithplague said...

I find much with which I agree in your reply. Thank you for taking the time to clarify and explain further. We may not be approaching things differently after all.

Tara said...

Ruth, thanks for sharing your thoughts with us. I agree with much of what you have said. This administration does, at times, almost literally make me sick.
You may remember from reading my blog that we pay more than 20% of our very modest income for health insurance. We have a $5,000 deductible plus my husband has $ deducted from his check each month to help pay for the actual insurance. It's crazy. I really hope things change.

Brad said...

Right on Ruth. To say I agree with all your points here would be an understatement. The term "nail on head" comes to mind.

Mauigirl said...

Great post, Ruth. I need to do this meme too (was tagged too as you know!) and will try to answer it shortly. Yesterday I got too caught up in the financial crisis to get around to doing my meme!